Friday, February 8, 2008

McCain, Hillary and why we need EITHER!

The politics of Jesus Christ are concerned with feeding the poor.

Part of feeding the poor, sadly, involves protection of resources, to include food, water and infrastructure. The U.S. Military (including even nuclear weapons . . .) is a sad, sad, necessity of life. NO ONE wants to go kill people!

ONLY socio-paths actually look forward to killing their next Iraqi insurgent, their next Iranian, et al.

No, the true warrior (including MANY good airmen, soldiers, seamen, et al) are committed to only utilizing lethal force to protect the innocent.

Other nations destroy not only the will to live, but even contaminate the food, water, etc.

Whether it was nazi Germany or now communist China that squelched all dissent, other nations are brutal compared to us. Yes, we may have our flaws, but generally we are a more just people, a more honor-bound people, a people less likely to commit genocide.

Call it the 'American experiment in democratic rule . . .' Call it 'checks and balances on power . . .' Call it our nation's founding Judeo-Christian heritage!!!

When all is said and done, we do not commit genocide when other nations do.

This is why I am quite happy to see BOTH Senator McCain and Senator Clinton rise to the top.

A Barack Obama presidency would be a disaster waiting to happen.

Obama was only elected in 2004 to the Senate! Obama lacks the experience to lead!

By contrast, McCain was a P.O.W. for 5 & 1/2 years in Vietnam, survived brutal torture methods by the Viet Cong and comes from an honorable lineage--grandfather was an admiral in WW II and his father was a submarine commander in WW II who not only eventually became a prominent admiral himself, but also read his daily Scriptures during his time as a career military leader!

McCain is a throwback. Maybe we need McCain to lead us.

Hillary would be my second choice, but only because she is a strong supporter of the U.S. Military.

Blessings in Jesus Christ,
Rob J. King, DEMOCRAT for McCain (or Huckabee, but the polls do not look promising . . .)

No comments: